Unknown's avatar

The State of British Royalty

This isn’t a topic I usually delve into, but every now and then, thoughts about the Royal Family come to mind, and I feel compelled to express them. My interest in the monarchy has been somewhat sporadic over the years, which explains why I don’t often share my views. However, having observed their interactions with the media and those who claim to represent public opinion for quite some time, it has become increasingly clear to me that the Royal Family does not operate independently, despite any assertions to the contrary. In reality, they are heavily influenced and controlled by external forces comprised of individuals who have no personal ties to them—primarily those who are either employed by the monarchy or involved in some form of contractual relationship.

Everyone recognizes that the monarchy operates within a constitutional framework, which, on the surface, implies a lack of concrete political power. However, the Royals manage to exert significant influence over various facets of legislation, acting as the Head of State during formal engagements with foreign dignitaries. These interactions often serve the purpose of “soft power,” creating an atmosphere reminiscent of the 16th century, wherein visitors are ceremoniously introduced to figures they perceive as true rulers.

Yet, the crux of my thoughts doesn’t rest solely on this dynamic. What preoccupies me is the realization that the Royal Family appears to have surrendered control over their own lives. Their decisions and actions seem to be dictated not by personal choice but by the whims of the public and the relentless scrutiny of the media. Over the last nine years, virtually every step they have taken has been either shaped by sensational tabloid headlines or determined by questionable public opinion polls. It’s astonishing to witness a family unwittingly transform into puppets of the press. In this scenario, it becomes evident that not even the government is exerting control over them, which at least would present a semblance of rational governance.

Here we have an entire family that has effectively relinquished their autonomy, allowing their lives to be governed by the collective will of the public and by a handful of billionaires who remain detached from the everyday realities of life in the nation. Internal conflicts arise as they turn against one another based on the media’s portrayal of family dynamics, with the press dictating allegiances and rivalries. The idea of surrendering one’s free will so completely—merely to secure a place of acceptance within society—strikes me as profoundly weak and shallow. This desire to be viewed favorably and maintain a status above the general populace seems to overshadow any sense of integrity or strength they might possess.

As someone observing these dynamics, I truly struggle to understand how anyone could view this family as admirable or deserving of respect. Their behavior suggests a disconnect from the normative values of love and fidelity that most families share. Instead, they seem willing to betray each other for the sake of personal advancement, revealing a painful truth about individuals who are ostensibly revered as exemplars of gentility and grace. If the current trajectory continues, I foresee a breakdown within the family—a consequence of harboring so much negativity and bitterness that it becomes unsustainable in the long run.

Ultimately, the Royal Family, these so-called “Royal Puppets,” may continue to inhabit their opulent castles, but I can’t help but think they will face a lonely existence, richly rewarded despite their isolation. Their fulfillment appears to stem from the accumulation of wealth drawn from an unknowing public, rather than from genuine human connection or familial love. It’s a rather sad commentary on what it means to possess power and wealth while lacking the very qualities that make life meaningful.